The Zimmerman trial throws me another zinger. Just before closing arguments the prosecution says it wants to add a new charge--aggravated assault. It's obvious why. The prosecution knows it hasn't proven second degree murder and it is desperate to get him on something. If the judge allows this--and she probably will--Zimmerman's goose is cooked. The jury won't want to convict him of something for which there is no proof but the jurors will also want to throw the state a bone, after all the trouble it went to prosecuting Zimmerman and all.
One thing about the trial. The judge absolutely badgered Zimmerman to testify. The judge kept asking if he knew that it was his right to testify. Of course he knew that. Asking that in a criminal trial is like asking if water is wet. And if he didn't know his attorneys certainly told him. The judge was adamant however. When his attorney tried to speak the judge angrily brushed him aside. Twice. Then she asked Zimmerman if it was his own decision not to testify. Why should it be his decision? That's why he is paying the attorney--to advise him on such matters.
The judge wants a conviction. And if she thinks the jury won't go for 2nd degree murder she will allow them to compromise at this late date by adding the new charge of aggravated assault.
No comments:
Post a Comment